Join me?

I attended a bible study last Sunday evening on the other side of town. During the Q & A the leader told me that my spiritual gift was “opening cans of worms,” to which a responded with a shrug and the realization that I might have said too much. During my answer to my own question I introduced the small, but alert group to the avenues. I think subconsciously I was inviting them to join me.

Can You Take Freedom

I was visiting at a church out of town a few weeks ago, after “big church” we walked down the woodchip path in the warm Sunday morning sun to the College House for Sunday school. The lesson for the day had a evangelistic appeal with the text being 1 Corinthians 8:9-12. I felt the lesson for the day, although the teacher meant well (and is a really nice guy), did no justice to the text; moreover, missed the whole principle of the text altogether. However, this is commonplace when we pull text for our topic rather than looking to the text to give us the topic. At this point if my first college mentor was reading along he would tell us both a story of a young seminary student who failed a presentation for the same reason. During Sunday school I leaned over to my beautiful girlfriend and mentioned my disappointment with the missed principle, which was followed by her sliding away from my critical whisper (Yes I am too critical). Therefore, I will depart from the means of which the remainder of this post found it’s beginning and turn to some observations on freedom, discipline and the avenue.

In 1 Corinthians 8, the apostle of the heart set free, sets out to answer questions concerning food offered to idols much like he sets out to answer questions on marriage in chapter 7. The issue was: what should Christians do with about buying, eating, and the location of the consumption of meat that had been “consecrated to a pagan god.” According to Blomberg, Paul provides a “two-pronged” solution: freedom and voluntary abstention. Both solutions flow from the overarching principle and motivation of love. This is the principle that was omitted or simply not addressed or mentioned during the Sunday school lesson and the heart of my disappointment.

We have freedom within absolutes (vs. 4-6 provide the foundation for freedom); the freedom can and should be restricted or limited by love. Some reasons include:

“Love, not knowledge, must form the foundation of Christian behavior.” (vs. 1) Blomberg

“Love, by contrast, builds solidly, and does not pretend to be what it is not. If [love] gives stature to a person or to a community, that enlargement remains solid and genuine.” Thiselton

“True Christian knowledge is inseparable from love, which can be produced only by God’s prior choice to love us (vs. 3).” Blomberg

Ryrie says this about 8:13, “here is the great principle that regulates conduct in morally indifferent matters. It is the principle of love voluntarily regulating liberty.” There is much more that has been and could be said about 1 Corinthian 8, such as the presupposition of election and initiative expressed in vs. 3. I also think that at first consideration the restriction appears to make the freedom “stuffy.” However, I think restriction can be a joy producer. What do you think?

A Sent Email

Below is an email response to a friend that asked me about the fourth chapter of Hebrews. (All names and items of personal nature were removed)

Your email was laced with too many questions for me to address them all in one email; therefore, I will attempt to address the first and we’ll see what happens from there. If I remember your question correctly your question found its focus on the target. We must understand the right stating of “rest” as it is the foundation of the discourse “and the hinge on which it turns.” Chapter 4 begins with a “therefore” and therefore, we must see what comes next as a conclusion to Hebrews 3 and more specifically verse 19. It seems that the author is telling the reader that we should fear unbelief, that we should “fear not trusting God.” The thought is continued in 4:2 with preaching for both groups; however, the latter now has something to learn from the former. The word communicated to the former group was no profit to them, why? Because it was not united by faith (4:2). Piper says this, “In other words, Israel fell from the promised joy of God because of the disobedience of unbelief. ”Not only did the former group not profit from the word they also perished as a result of unbelief. This serves as a good reason for fear: if what I hear is not united by faith (vs.2) then I will too likewise perish. From verse 3 we see that faith is the means by which we enter God’s rest, “for we who believed enter that rest” (4:3). There is so much more to say about 4:4-10, but I will spare you from my ramblings for now and try to hit the nail on the head.

I have heard “rest” to mean two things: eternal rest and spiritual rest (in the sense that we enter this rest after regeneration/conversion and it ultimately leads to eternal rest. Therefore, we see that the full process of salvation, the 'already, not yet' is all apart of the 'spiritual rest') The issues at hand is what is the definition of rest? The “rest” as John Owen would say is, “Firstly and principally,” a spiritual rest “which believers obtain an entrance into by Jesus Christ, in the faith and worship of the gospel, and is not to be restrained unto their eternal rest in heaven.” Owen argues the unrestrained rest is clear in three major points: 1) The grammatical structure the author uses, 2) The author is not suggesting/exhorting perseverance, 3) The use of Canaan as a type and typology of Christ (I think you used the term “picture”). After the unrestrained rest is “proved” Owen suggests that what remains is an inquiry into the nature of the unrestrained rest that he calls Gospel-state, or Gospel-rest, what the rest is, and “wherein is doth consist.”

If you’ve ever read anything by Owen you probably know that he never handles anything in a simplistic fashion (perhaps you are beginning to feel the same way about me, so to avoid confusion let me wrap this up). In short I agree with Owen that the “rest” is unrestricted (or spiritual rest as defined above), that we as believers can enter that rest now. And even better, the “rest” is still available for people to enter (vs. 9). What is the rest? I think I would say the rest is joy in God (Ps.16:11) that is only possible through faith. I think with many more words and time I could better develop this precious rest/joy that is ours in Christ and why faith is a driving factor of that rest; however, I think I will leave it at that for now. Let me know what you think.